Kate Storey

Many farmers are willing to sell a side of beef, a few dozen eggs or a bag of potatoes to their acquaintances. Farmers have been direct marketing since agriculture began and it is only in the last 50 years that direct farm to consumer sales have been questioned. Up until then, governments encouraged farmers in the art of safe food production and processing. (Some can still remember that 4H lesson on how to properly butcher a chicken.) At one time, many citizens knew their farmer.

Then came the agribusiness revolution and farmers were encouraged to abandon their small enterprises and specialize in the commodity market. Citizens became consumers and within two generations the social link between table and farm was broken.

Now, the grocery store rules the food system with a massive, complicated and expensive network of middlemen who ensure a constant supply of every food imaginable. The food is cheap but citizens have gradually noticed that the quality and taste have changed. Occasional food recalls and stories of factory conditions have contributed to a general worry about industrial food quality. Consumers grumble and keep going to the grocery store anyway, but a growing number of citizens have started buying directly from a farm.

Some farmers are answering the demand with direct food sales at the farmgate and farmers’ markets. When it suits them, governments jump on the bandwagon and proclaim their support for local foods. It is telling that when it is bottled in Manitoba, Pepsi was defined as a “local” food.

Many farmers have bought into the idea that bigger is better and some have taken it one step further to believe that smaller is bad. Farm commodity associations have pushed through rules which ignore the needs of small scale food producers and actively discourage sales at the farmgate and farmers’ markets.

When challenged, they talk about food safety, however, most rules have nothing to do with food safety. Export protocols, international traceability, food sizing, fancy packaging, double signatures and paved parking lots are not necessary when the business is small and the consumer can question the farmer directly.

Governments have mandated commodity associations to focus on expanding export markets at the expense of small-scale food. So, it was quite a surprise when the Manitoba government commissioned a Small Scale Food Report.

Well, maybe it wasn’t a surprise. A popular farm had first been commended, and then raided over a regulation technicality. The resulting public furor was loud and long. When faced with public outrage, a government’s strongest defense is to commission a report.

The eighteen people selected for the Small Scale Food Manitoba working group included four small -scale direct market farmers. Of the rest, five were staff from associations which represent industrial agriculture, including Maple Leaf Foods and Canada’s biggest egg conglomerate, Burnbrae Farms.

Estimates are that about three percent of Manitoba’s food is sold at the farmgate or farmers’ markets. The report suggests that this market share could grow to ten percent and that would set direct marketing in direct competition with commodity agriculture. Industrial operators see ten percent as the difference between profit and loss and they are unlikely to give up a share of their market willingly.

The Small Scale Food Manitoba Report recommends that small-scale food producers create an association, use it to negotiate with the big associations and convince them to change the rules so that small farmers can have part of their market. The report recommends that associations “foster a diversity of production methods” and recognize small scale producers “as legitimate members of the commodity group”. It also calls for “a collaborative, inclusive context among the existing boards, small scale specialty producers, government policy analysts and consumers.” That would be a reversal of the long-standing promotion of industrial farming.

Is collaboration possible? Industrial agriculture has a virtual monopoly. Now it is asked to embrace diversity and give up a piece of the market. Is it time to start sharing the table with small farms?

Public support for small farms is strong and getting stronger. As the report points out, commodity associations “have been granted a social license to provide a predictable supply of food to the public.” But the growing popularity of small scale food and farmers’ markets is a sign that the public wants more than what the industrial food system can provide. The question is, what will the Manitoba government do to make a real place for small scale producers at the table?


Kate Storey is a Manitoba farmer, member of the National Farmers Union, and a direct marketer who works with Sharing the Table Manitoba.

Small Scale Food Manitoba presented their report to Hon. Ron Kostyshyn, Manitoba Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development on January 14, 2015. The report is available at http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/food-and-ag-processing/small-scale-food-manitoba.html.

The Manitoba government’s response is available at http://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.html?archive=&item=33691.

This article has been published by the National Farmers Union, the Manitoba Cooperator, and Manitoba Alternative Food Research Alliance, and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Fast Facts.

Manitoba’s Small Scale Food Report is Food for Thought

One thought on “Manitoba’s Small Scale Food Report is Food for Thought

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *